In a cardiovascular outcomes trial, 8,803 patients were exposed to Wegovy for a median of 37.3 months and 8,801 patients were exposed to placebo for a median of 38.6 months (see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics under Actions). Safety data collection was limited to serious adverse events (including death), adverse events leading to discontinuation, and adverse events of special interest. Sixteen percent (16%) of Wegovy-treated patients and 8% of placebo-treated patients, respectively, discontinued study drug due to an adverse event. Additional information from this trial is included in subsequent sections as follows when relevant.
Tabulated list of adverse reactions: Table 13 lists adverse reactions identified in phase 3a clinical trials in adults and post-marketing reports. The frequencies are based on a pool of the phase 3a trials.
Adverse reactions associated with Wegovy are listed by system organ class and frequency. Frequency categories are defined as: Very common (≥1/10); common (≥1/100 to <1/10); uncommon (≥1/1,000 to <1/100); rare (≥1/10,000 to <1/1,000); very rare (<1/10,000) and not known (cannot be estimated from the available data). (See Table 13.)

Description of selected adverse reactions: Gastrointestinal adverse reactions: Over the 68 weeks trial period, nausea occurred in 43.9% of patients when treated with semaglutide (16.1% for placebo), diarrhoea in 29.7% (15.9% for placebo) and vomiting in 24.5% (6.3% for placebo). Most events were mild to moderate in severity and of short duration. Constipation occurred in 24.2% of patients treated with semaglutide (11.1% for placebo) and was mild to moderate in severity and of longer duration. In patients treated with semaglutide, median duration of nausea was 8 days, vomiting 2 days, diarrhoea 3 days, and constipation 47 days.
Patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2) may experience more gastrointestinal effects when treated with semaglutide.
The gastrointestinal events led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 4.3% of patients.
Acute pancreatitis: The frequency of adjudication-confirmed acute pancreatitis reported in phase 3a clinical trials was 0.2% for semaglutide and <0.1% for placebo, respectively.
Acute gallstone disease/Cholelithiasis: Cholelithiasis was reported in 1.6% and led to cholecystitis in 0.6% of patients treated with semaglutide. Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis was reported in 1.1% and 0.3%, respectively, of patients treated with placebo.
Hair loss: Hair loss was reported in 2.5% of patients treated with semaglutide and in 1.0% of patients treated with placebo. The events were mainly of mild severity and most patients recovered while on continued treatment. Hair loss was reported more frequently in patients with a greater weight loss (≥20%).
Increased heart rate: In the phase 3a trials, a mean increase of 3 beats per minute (bpm) from a baseline mean of 72 bpm was observed in patients treated with semaglutide. The proportions of subjects with an increase in pulse from baseline ≥10 bpm at any timepoint during the on-treatment period were 67.0% in the semaglutide group vs. 50.1% in the placebo group.
Immunogenicity: Consistent with the potentially immunogenic properties of medicinal products containing proteins or peptides, patients may develop antibodies following treatment with semaglutide. The proportion of patients testing positive for anti-semaglutide antibodies at any time post-baseline was low (2.9%) and no patients had anti-semaglutide neutralising antibodies or anti-semaglutide antibodies with endogenous GLP-1 neutralising effect at end-of-trial. During treatment, high semaglutide concentrations might have lowered the sensitivity of the assays, hence the risk of false negatives cannot be excluded. However, in subjects testing positive for antibodies during and after treatment, the presence of antibodies was transient and with no apparent impact on efficacy and safety.
Hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: In STEP 2, clinically significant hypoglycaemia was observed in 6.2% (0.1 events/patient year) of subjects treated with semaglutide compared with 2.5% (0.03 events/patient year) of subjects treated with placebo. Hypoglycaemia with semaglutide was seen both with and without concomitant use of sulfonylurea. One episode (0.2% of subjects, 0.002 events/patient year) was reported as severe in a subject not concomitantly treated with a sulfonylurea. The risk of hypoglycaemia was increased when semaglutide was used with a sulfonylurea.
Diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 2-year clinical trial investigated semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg vs. placebo in 3,297 patients with type 2 diabetes, with high cardiovascular risk, long duration of diabetes and poorly controlled blood glucose. In this trial, adjudicated events of diabetic retinopathy complications occurred in more patients treated with semaglutide (3.0%) compared to placebo (1.8%). This was observed in insulin-treated patients with known diabetic retinopathy. The treatment difference appeared early and persisted throughout the trial. In STEP 2, retinal disorders were reported by 6.9% of patients treated with Wegovy, 6.2% of patients treated with semaglutide 1 mg, and 4.2% of patients treated with placebo. The majority of events were reported as diabetic retinopathy (4.0%, 2.7%, and 2.7%, respectively) and non-proliferative retinopathy (0.7%, 0%, and 0%, respectively).
Paediatric population: In a clinical trial conducted in adolescents of 12 years to below 18 years with obesity or overweight with at least one weight-related comorbidity, 133 patients were exposed to Wegovy. The trial duration was 68 weeks.
Overall, the frequency, type and severity of adverse reactions in the adolescents were comparable to that observed in the adult population. Cholelithiasis was reported in 3.8% of patients treated with Wegovy and 0% of patients treated with placebo.
No effects on growth or pubertal development were found after 68 weeks of treatment.
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions: Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the national reporting system.
View ADR Reporting Link