Pharmacology: MECHANISM OF ACTION: BOTOX is a sterile, vacuum-dried form of purified botulinum neurotoxin type A complex, produced from a culture of the Hall strain of
Clostridium botulinum grown in a medium containing N-Z amine, glucose and yeast extract. It is purified to a crystalline complex consisting of the neurotoxin, a non-toxic protein and four major hemagglutinin proteins.
BOTOX blocks neuromuscular conduction by binding to receptor sites on motor nerve terminals, entering the nerve terminals, and inhibiting the release of acetylcholine. In sensory neurons, BOTOX inhibits the release of sensory neurotransmitters (e.g., Substance P, CGRP) and downregulates the expression of cell surface receptors (e.g., TRPV1). BOTOX also prevents and reverses sensitization in nociceptive sensory neurons. When injected intramuscularly at therapeutic doses, BOTOX produces partial chemical denervation of the muscle resulting in localized muscle paralysis. When chemically denervated, the muscle may atrophy, axonal sprouting may occur, and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors may develop. There is evidence that reinnervation of the muscle may occur, thus reversing muscle weakness produced by localized injection of BOTOX.
Following intradetrusor injections, BOTOX affects the efferent pathways of detrusor activity via inhibition of acetylcholine release. In addition, BOTOX inhibits afferent neurotransmitters and sensory pathways.
The primary release procedure for BOTOX uses a cell-based potency assay to determine the potency relative to a reference standard. The assay is specific to Allergan's product BOTOX. One Allergan Unit (U) of BOTOX corresponds to the calculated median intraperitoneal lethal dose (LD
50) in mice. Due to specific method details such as the vehicle, dilution scheme and laboratory protocols, Units of biological activity of BOTOX can not be compared to or converted into units of any other botulinum toxin activity. The specific activity of BOTOX is approximately 20 U/nanogram of neurotoxin protein complex.
PHARMACODYNAMICS: When injected into neck muscles, BOTOX reduces both objective signs and subjective symptoms of cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis). These improvements include reduced angle of head turning, reduced shoulder elevation, decreased size and strength of hypertrophic muscles, and decreased pain. Based on the results of well-controlled studies, 40-58% of patients with cervical dystonia would be expected to have a significant improvement in their symptoms.
The paralytic effect on muscles injected with BOTOX reduces the excessive, abnormal contractions of blepharospasm associated with dystonia.
When used for the treatment of strabismus, it has been postulated that the administration of BOTOX affects muscle pairs by inducing an atrophic lengthening of the injected muscle and a corresponding shortening of the antagonist muscle.
Following injection of BOTOX some distant muscles have shown increased electrophysiologic neuromuscular jitter. This effect is not associated with other types of electrophysiologic abnormalities, or with clinical signs of weakness or symptoms regarding either safety or efficacy.
In the treatment of pediatric cerebral palsy patients with dynamic equinus foot deformity due to spasticity, BOTOX injections into the gastrocnemius produce an improvement in ankle position (reduction in equinus) and an improvement in gait pattern due to increased heel-to-floor contact.
In the treatment of hyperhidrosis of the axillae (N=320), BOTOX-treated patients demonstrated a responder rate based on gravimetric assessment of 95% at week 1 and 82% at week 16. The mean percentage reduction in sweat production in the BOTOX-treated patients ranged from 83% at week 1 to 69% at week 16. Treatment response has been reported to persist for 4 to 7 months (average of 5.2 months) in patients (N=12) treated with 50 U per axillae. Repeat injections should be administered when effects from previous injections subside.
When used for the treatment of focal spasticity BOTOX injected into upper limb muscles reduces the objective signs and subjective symptoms of spasticity. Improvements include reduction of muscle tone, increase in range of motion, and in some patients reduction of spasticity-related disability.
When used for the prophylaxis of headaches in adults with chronic migraine BOTOX may act as an inhibitor of neurotransmitters associated with the genesis of pain. The presumed mechanism for headache prophylaxis is by blocking peripheral signals to the central nervous system, which inhibits central sensitization, as suggested by preclinical studies.
Clinical Studies: Blepharospasm: In one study, injection of botulinum toxin was evaluated in 27 patients with essential blepharospasm. Twenty-six (26) of the patients had previously undergone drug treatment utilizing benztropine mesylate, clonazepam and/or baclofen without adequate clinical results. Three of these patients then underwent muscle stripping surgery, again without an adequate outcome. One patient of the 27 was previously untreated. Twenty-five (25) of the 27 patients reported improvement within 48 hours following injection of botulinum toxin. Blepharospasm in one of the other patients was later controlled with a higher dosage of botulinum toxin. The remaining patient reported only mild improvement but remained functionally impaired.
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 12 patients with blepharospasm were evaluated; 8 patients received botulinum toxin and 4 received placebo. All patients who received botulinum toxin improved compared to none in the placebo group. Among the botulinum toxin-treated patients, the mean dystonia score improved by 72%, the self-assessment score rating improved by 61%, and a videotape evaluation rating improved by 39%. The mean duration of treatment effects was 12.5 weeks.
In an open trial, 1684 patients with blepharospasm showed clinical improvement after treatment with BOTOX lasting an average of 12.5 weeks prior to the need for re-treatment.
Strabismus: In an open trial, 677 patients with strabismus were treated with one or more injections of BOTOX. Fifty-five percent (55%) of these patients were improved to an alignment of 10 prism diopters or less when evaluated six months or more following injection. These results are consistent with results from additional open label trials which were conducted for this indication.
Cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis): In a double-blind, vehicle-controlled parallel study, 51 patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis) were evaluated. Patients treated with BOTOX experienced an average of 8 to 12 degrees decrease in head rotation at rest, corresponding to a mean decrease of 13% to 20%, respectively. There was also a significant decrease in strength and size of the contralateral sternocleidomastoid and trapezii (i.e., muscles involved in head rotation). Vehicle-treated patients showed a mean decrease of only 0 to 4 degrees (0% to 6%) of head rotation at rest, and had no change in muscle strength or size. The difference in head rotation between treatment groups was statistically significant. Among BOTOX treated patients, improvement was reported by 42%, 58% and 57% of the patients at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after injection, respectively. Improvement was reported by 8%, 8% and 17% of vehicle-treated subjects at the same time points, respectively.
In a double-blind, vehicle-controlled crossover study, there was a significant decrease in the size of the sternocleidomastoid muscle contralateral to head turning following BOTOX compared to placebo injection. By crossover analysis, 41% of patients reported a positive global assessment of response after BOTOX injection (which includes measures of head rotation, head tilt, anterocollis, retrocollis, duration of sustained movements, shoulder elevation and tremor duration and severity), compared to 14% after vehicle injection.
Two additional double-blind, vehicle-controlled crossover studies evaluated the efficacy of BOTOX in patients with cervical dystonia. There was a significant decrease in discomfort in the patients treated with BOTOX in one study. In the other study, patients treated with BOTOX had a mean decrease in head rotation of 18% (crossover analysis)
and 30% (parallel analysis) compared with a mean decrease in head rotation of 3% (crossover) and 16% (parallel) in patients treated with placebo. In both of these studies, the global assessment of cervical dystonia showed trends of improvement for patients treated with BOTOX relative to those treated with vehicle.
Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: In a three-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study, 145 ambulatory children with cerebral palsy, 2 to 16 years of age, were evaluated. Patients exhibited muscle spasticity of the lower extremity(ies) associated with an equinovalgus foot position during gait. A significantly greater number of patients treated with BOTOX vs. placebo demonstrated improvement based on a physician's rating of dynamic gait which was composed of assessments of gait pattern, ankle position, hindfoot position during foot strike, knee position during gait, degree of crouch and speed of gait. Improvement was reported by 53%, 50%, 60% and 54% of BOTOX-treated patients vs. 25%, 27%, 25% and 32% of placebo-treated patients at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12, respectively. Of the individual assessments which were included in the physician's rating of dynamic gait, a significantly greater number of BOTOX-treated vs. placebo-treated subjects had improvements in gait pattern (Weeks 2, 8, and 12) and ankle position (Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12).
Electromyography confirmed that BOTOX produces a partial denervation of the gastrocnemius muscle. No significant changes in electromyography were seen in the placebo-treated patients.
In a long-term, open-label study, 207 patients were evaluated for up to three years. The percent of patients who showed an improvement based on the physician's rating of dynamic gait ranged from 41% to 67% over the three-year period. Of the individual assessments which were included in the physician's rating of dynamic gait, significant improvements in gait pattern were seen at every visit over the three-year period.
Focal Spasticity in Adults: Upper Limb Spasticity: The efficacy of BOTOX used for the treatment of upper limb spasticity associated with stroke was evaluated in double-blind and open label studies in 387 unique patients who received 531 treatment exposures.
In a three month, double-blind, placebo controlled study, 126 patients with upper limb spasticity post-stroke were treated with 200 U to 240 U of BOTOX into the wrist, finger, and thumb flexor muscles. A clinically significant greater reduction in muscle tone was observed in BOTOX treated patients compared to placebo as measured on the Ashworth scale 1 to 12 weeks post-treatment. The Physician Global Assessment showed parallel statistically significant improvements. Furthermore, patients treated with BOTOX had significant improvement for a predetermined, targeted disability item associated with upper limb spasticity at 4 to 12 weeks post-treatment.
In three- and four-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging studies involving a total of 130 patients with upper limb spasticity post-stroke, patients were treated with a total dose of up to 300 U or 360 U of BOTOX. Improvements in wrist, elbow and finger flexor muscle tone were reported at the highest dose in each study at various timepoints. The Physician Global Assessment also showed significant benefit at doses ranging from 75 to 360 U at various timepoints.
Lower Limb Spasticity: The efficacy and safety of BOTOX for the treatment of lower limb spasticity was evaluated in a randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. This study included 468 post-stroke patients (233 BOTOX and 235 placebo) with lower limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS] ankle score of at least 3) who were at least 3 months post-stroke. Patients with previous surgical intervention, phenol block, ethanol block, or muscle afferent bloc to treat lower limb spasticity were excluded from the study.
BOTOX 300 to 400 Units or placebo were injected intramuscularly into the study mandatory muscles gastrocnemius, soleus, and tibialis posterior and optional muscles including flexor hallucis longus, flexor digitorum longus, flexor digitorum brevis, extensor hallucis, and rectus femoris (see table as follows). The use of electromyographic guidance, nerve stimulation, or ultrasound was required to assist in proper muscle localization for injections. Patients were followed for 12 weeks. (See Table 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The primary endpoint was the average change from baseline of weeks 4 and 6 MAS ankle score and a key secondary endpoint was the average CGI (Physician Global Assessment of Response) at weeks 4 and 6. The MAS uses a similar scoring system as the Ashworth Scale. The CGI evaluated the response to treatment in terms of how the patient was doing in his/her life using a 9-point scale from -4=very marked worsening to +4=very marked improvement.
Statistically and clinically significant between-group differences for BOTOX over placebo were demonstrated for the primary efficacy measures of MAS and key secondary measure of CGI and are presented in Table 3 as follows. (See Table 3.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
FHL = flexor hallucis longus; FDL = flexor digitorum longus; FDB = flexor digitorum brevis.
Statistically significant improvements in MAS change from baseline (see Figure 1) and CGI by Physician (see Figure 2) for BOTOX were observed at weeks 2, 4, and 6, compared to placebo. (See Figures 1 and 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Hyperhidrosis of the Axillae: When injected intradermally, BOTOX produces temporary chemical denervation of the sweat gland resulting in local reduction in sweating. The efficacy and safety of BOTOX for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis were evaluated in a randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
In the study, 320 adults with bilateral axillary primary hyperhidrosis were randomized to receive either 50 U of BOTOX (n=242) or placebo (n=78). Treatment responders were defined as subjects showing at least a 50% reduction from baseline in axillary sweating measured by gravimetric measurement at 4 weeks. At week 4 post-injection, the percentages of responders were 91% (219/242) in the BOTOX group and 36% (28/78) in the placebo group, p < 0.001.
The difference in percentage of responders between BOTOX and placebo was 55% (95% CI = 43.3, 65.9).
Upper Facial Lines (Glabellar Lines, Crow's Feet, Forehead Lines): In a clinical study, the safety and efficacy of BOTOX was compared with placebo for the treatment of glabellar lines. BOTOX was administered to 203 subjects as a single treatment of intramuscular injections at 5 sites, 2 in each corrugator muscle and 1 in the procerus muscle. Each injection was 0.1 mL (4 U), for a total of 0.5 mL (20 U). The following was concluded: >80% of subjects responded to treatment as rated by investigators and >90% by self-assessment.
For both primary efficacy variables, the investigator's rating of glabellar line severity at maximum frown and the subject's global assessment of change of appearance of glabellar lines, there was a statistically and clinically significant higher responder rate with BOTOX than with placebo at all timepoints from day 7 through day 120 (p<0.001).
For the investigator's rating of glabellar line severity at rest, there was a significantly higher responder rate with BOTOX than with placebo at all timepoints.
Subgroup analyses of the primary efficacy variables by age group (≤50 years and ≥51 years) and by investigator gave results similar to those for the overall study population.
Subjects rated their impression of improvement even more highly than did the investigators, particularly later in the study. By day 120, 44.1% of subjects rated their appearance as at least moderately improved.
BOTOX was shown in this study to be well-tolerated, with no treatment-related serious adverse events.
The safety and efficacy of BOTOX for the treatment of horizontal forehead lines has been described in published investigator clinical studies. BOTOX was administered to 59 subjects as a single treatment of intramuscular injections at injection doses into the frontalis of 8, 16 and 24 U. The following was concluded: Approximately 90% of subjects responded to treatment as rated by investigators and up to 75-80% by self-assessment.
There was a reduction in horizontal rhytide severity in all three BOTOX treatment groups at both contraction and repose.
There was a significant dose-response trend for rate of improvement at maximum brow elevation: 53% in the 24 U group versus 15% in the 8 U group at 16 weeks, by a trained observer.
There was a significant dose-response trend for rate of relapse to baseline: 35% in the 24 U group versus 75% in the 8 U group at 16 weeks, by a trained observer.
BOTOX was shown in this study to be well-tolerated, with no treatment-related serious adverse events.
The most common treatment-related adverse events were headache, local pain and swelling resulting from injection.
In another published investigator clinical study, the safety and efficacy of BOTOX was compared with placebo for the treatment of lateral canthal lines (crow's feet). BOTOX was administered to 60 subjects in orbicularis oculi muscle as a single injection treatment at one of 3 doses (6, 12 and 18 U total) on one side, and placebo contralaterally. In a second study of lateral canthal lines, BOTOX (5-15 U) was injected on each side in 80 subjects. The following was concluded: BOTOX was associated with significantly higher success rates than placebo at all dose levels, as determined by both trained observers and patients.
At four weeks post-injection, 89-95% patients on the BOTOX-treated side were considered by investigators as treatment responders, and 60-80% of patients felt they had treatment success, compared to approximately 5-15% and 15-45%, respectively on the placebo-treated side.
No clear dose-response relationship was observed.
Benefits of the second injection lasted longer than the first. The success rate of a second injection reached 100% for the 12 and 18 U groups, and approximately 80% of patients were considered treatment successes at 16 weeks, for all groups.
Patient surveys revealed high satisfaction with BOTOX treatments; 89% described themselves as satisfied or very satisfied; 93% indicated they would undergo treatment again.
BOTOX was well tolerated. No serious or severe adverse events were reported. The most common adverse event related to treatment was bruising; the incidence was similar on the placebo-treated side.
Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluated BOTOX (N=921, randomized to receive any BOTOX treatment or N=257, randomized to receive placebo) for the temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe forehead lines (FHL).
Study 1 assessed BOTOX treatment of FHL with glabellar lines (GL); Study 2 also assessed simultaneous treatment of FHL, GL, and lateral canthal lines [LCL]. Both studies enrolled healthy adults with moderate to severe FHL at maximum eyebrow elevation at baseline and moderate to severe GL at maximum frown at baseline; Study 2 also required subjects to have moderate to severe LCL at maximum smile at baseline.
In the 12-month Study 1, subjects were randomized to receive BOTOX 20 Units to the frontalis muscle with 20 Units to the glabellar region (for a total of 40 Units) or placebo in both areas.
In the 12-month Study 2, subjects were randomized to receive BOTOX 20 Units to the frontalis muscle, 20 Units to the glabellar region, and 0 Units to the LCL region (for a total of 40 units) or BOTOX 20 Units to the frontalis muscle, 20 Units to the glabellar region, and 24 Units to the LCL region (for a total of 64 Units) or placebo in all three areas.
The primary efficacy measure was the assessment of FHL severity at maximum eyebrow elevation using the 4-point Facial Wrinkle Scale with Photonumeric Guide (FWS; 0=none, 1= mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The FWS assessment was performed independently by both investigators and subjects. The primary timepoint was Day 30 following the first treatment.
The primary efficacy response definition was a composite ≥2-grade improvement from baseline in FHL severity at maximum eyebrow elevation, assessed by both investigator and subject on a per-subject basis. For Studies 1 and 2, the proportion of responders was greater in the BOTOX Cosmetic arms compared to placebo at Day 30 (p<0.0001 for Studies 1 and 2). (See Table 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
A total of 165 and 197 subjects received 3 cycles over 1 year of BOTOX Cosmetic 40 Units (20 Units FHL with 20 Units GL) and 64 Units (20 Units FHL, 20 Units GL, and 24 Units LCL), respectively. The response rate for FHL was similar across all treatment cycles.
The results for a key secondary endpoint of responders achieving a grade of none or mild on investigator ratings at maximum eyebrow elevation of FHL severity are presented as follows for Studies 1 and 2. (See Figures 3 and 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The results of the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire are presented as follows. (See Table 5.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Chronic Migraine: BOTOX was evaluated in two multi-national, multi-center 56 week studies that included a 24 week, 2 injection cycle, double-blind phase comparing BOTOX to placebo that was followed by a 32-week, 3 injection cycle, open-label phase. A total of 1,384 chronic migraine adults who had either never received or were not using any concurrent headache prophylaxis, had > 15 headache days, with 50% being migraine/probable migraine, and > 4 headache episodes during a 28-day baseline phase were studied in 2 phase 3 clinical trials. These patients were randomized to placebo or to 155 U - 195 U BOTOX injections every 12 weeks, maximum 5 injection cycles. Patients were allowed to use acute headache treatments (65.5% overused acute treatments during the baseline period). The number (percentage) of patients who received BOTOX injections at 31 sites and at 39 sites at Week 12 were N=345/627 (55.0%) and N=44/627 (7.0%), respectively. (See Table 6 and 7.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
In Study 1, at the Week 24 primary timepoint, the mean changes from baseline in total cumulative hours of headache on headache days were -106.7 hours in the BOTOX group and -70.4 hours in the placebo group. At the Week 24 primary timepoint, the mean changes from baseline for total HIT-6 score were -4.7 in the BOTOX group and -2.4 in the placebo group in Study 1, and -4.9 in the BOTOX group and -2.4 in the placebo group in Study 2.
The treatment effect appeared smaller in the subgroup of male patients (N=188) than in the whole study population.
BOTOX for chronic migraine has not been evaluated in clinical trials beyond 5 injection cycles.
Overactive Bladder: Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multi-center, 24-week Phase 3 clinical studies were conducted in patients with OAB with symptoms of urinary incontinence, urgency, and frequency. A total of 1105 patients, whose symptoms had not been adequately managed with anticholinergic therapy (inadequate response or intolerable side effects), were randomised to receive either 100 Units of BOTOX (n=557), or placebo (n=548). Patients had to have at least 3 urinary urgency incontinence episodes and at least 24 micturitions in 3 days, a negative urine dipstick at randomisation and to be willing to use Clean Intermittent Catheterisation (CIC) if deemed necessary by the investigator. Patients were excluded if they had other urological conditions that could confound the studies such as: OAB secondary to any known neurological reason, a predominance of stress incontinence, anticholinergic treatment or any other therapies for OAB within the 7 days prior to baseline, already using CIC or an in-dwelling catheter, previous botulinum toxin therapy within the previous 12 weeks or immunisation for any botulinum toxin serotype, significant pelvic or urological abnormalities other than OAB or post-void residual (PVR) urine volume > 100 ml at screening among others.
Baseline characteristics were similar between the treatment groups in both studies: pooled mean age 60 years, 87.8% female, 90.9% Caucasian, 13.7% diabetic patients, mean 5.4 daily episodes of urinary incontinence, mean 11.7 daily episodes of micturition and mean 8.6 daily average urgency episodes.
In both studies, significant improvements compared to placebo in the change from baseline in daily frequency of urinary incontinence episodes were observed for BOTOX (100 U) at the primary time point of week 12, including the proportion of dry patients. Using the Treatment Benefit Scale, the proportion of patients reporting a positive treatment response (their condition has been 'greatly improved' or 'improved') was significantly greater in the BOTOX group compared to the placebo group in both studies. Significant improvements compared to placebo were also observed for the daily frequency of micturition, urgency, and nocturia episodes. Volume voided per micturition was also significantly higher. Significant improvements were observed in all OAB symptoms from week 2.
BOTOX treatment was associated with significant improvements over placebo in health related quality of life as measured by the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire (including avoidance and limiting behavior, psychosocial impact, and social embarrassment) and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) (including incontinence impact, role limitations, social limitations, physical limitations, personal relationships, emotions, sleep/energy, and severity/coping measures).
Results from the pivotal studies are presented as follows: (See Table 8.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
A total of 834 patients were evaluated in a long term extension study. For all efficacy endpoints, patients experienced consistent response with re-treatments. In the subset of 345 patients, who had reached week 12 of treatment cycle 3, the mean reductions in daily frequency of urinary incontinence were -3.07, -3.49, and -3.49 episodes at week 12 after the first, second, and third BOTOX 100 Unit treatments, respectively. The corresponding proportions of patients with a positive treatment response on the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) were 63.6%, 76.9%, and 77.3% respectively.
In the pivotal studies, none of the 615 (0%) patients with analyzed specimens developed the presence of serum neutralizing antibodies to BOTOX. In patients with analyzed specimens from the pivotal phase 3 and the open-label extension studies, neutralizing antibodies developed in 0 of 954 patients (0.0%) while receiving BOTOX 100 Unit doses and 3 of 260 patients (1.2%) after subsequently receiving at least one 150 Unit dose. One of these three patients continued to experience clinical benefit.
Only a limited number of males (n=135, 12.2%) were studied in the two phase 3 clinical studies and the results were not statistically significant for patients administered BOTOX compared to placebo. Results for the co-primary endpoints in males are presented as follows and further details are located in Precautions, Overactive Bladder, Use in Males: (See Table 9.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The median duration of response in patients who continued into the open label extension study and received treatments with only BOTOX 100 Units (N=438) was 212 days (~30 weeks).
To qualify for retreatment, at least 12 weeks must have passed since the prior treatment, post-void residual urine volume must have been less than 200 mL, and patients must have reported at least 2 urinary incontinence episodes over 3 days.
Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity: Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multi-center Phase 3 clinical studies were conducted in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity who were either spontaneously voiding or using catheterization. A total of 691 spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis patients, not adequately managed with at least one anticholinergic agent, were enrolled. These patients were randomized to receive either 200 U of BOTOX (n=227), 300 U of BOTOX (n=223), or placebo (n=241).
In both phase 3 studies, significant improvements compared to placebo in the primary efficacy variable of change from baseline in weekly frequency of incontinence episodes were observed for BOTOX (200 U and 300 U) at the primary efficacy time point at week 6. Significant improvements in urodynamic parameters including increase in maximum cystometric capacity and decreases in peak detrusor pressure during the first involuntary detrusor contraction were observed. These primary and secondary endpoints are shown in the tables and figures as follows.
No additional benefit of BOTOX 300 U over 200 U was demonstrated. (See Table 10 and 11, Figures 5 and 6.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The median duration of response in the two pivotal studies, based on patient request for retreatment, was 256-295 days (36-42 weeks) for the 200 Unit dose group compared to 92 days (13 weeks) with placebo. The median duration of response in patients who continued into the open label extension study and received treatments with only BOTOX 200 Units (N=174) was 253 days (~36 weeks). Retreatment criteria were: patient request, at least 12 weeks since previous treatment, and < 50% reduction (Study 1) or < 30% reduction (Study 2) from baseline in urinary incontinence episodes.
In the pivotal studies, none of the 475 neurogenic detrusor overactivity patients with analyzed specimens developed the presence of neutralizing antibodies. In patients with analyzed specimens in the drug development program (including the open-label extension study), neutralizing antibodies developed in 3 of 300 patients (1.0%) after receiving only BOTOX 200 Unit doses and 5 of 258 patients (1.9%) after receiving at least one 300 Unit dose. Four of these eight patients continued to experience clinical benefit.
PHARMACOKINETICS: It is believed that little systemic distribution of therapeutic doses of BOTOX occurs. BOTOX is not expected to be presented in the peripheral blood at measurable levels following IM or intradermal injection at the recommended doses. The recommended quantities of neurotoxin administered at each treatment session are not expected to result in systemic, overt distant clinical effects, i.e. muscle weakness, in patients without other neuromuscular dysfunction. However, clinical studies using single fiber electromyographic techniques have shown subtle electrophysiologic findings consistent with neuromuscular inhibition (i.e. "jitter") in muscles distant to the injection site, but these were unaccompanied by any clinical signs or symptoms of neuromuscular inhibition from the effects of botulinum toxin.